Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

The Skeptical Zone

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible that you may be mistaken."

The Skeptical Zone

Main menu

  • Home
  • About this site….
  • Rules
  • Sandbox (4)
    • Sandbox (3)
    • Sandbox (2)
    • Sandbox (1)
  • Moderation Issues (6)
    • Moderation Issues (5)
    • Moderation Issues (4)
    • Moderation Issues (3)
    • Moderation Issues (2)
    • Moderation Issues (1)
  • Noyau (2)
    • Noyau (1)
  • Messages
  • Guano (3)
    • Guano (2)
    • Guano (1)
  • Contact

Tag Archives: Michael Behe

Irreducible Complexity – a Weak Argument

Posted on January 18, 2021 by Nonlin.org
249

A lot has been argued about Irreducible Complexity. Here is a proposed solution to the conundrum. Continue reading →

Posted in Evolution | Tagged Irreducible Complexity, Kenneth R. Miller, Michael Behe | 249 Replies

Behe on LYST

Posted on February 27, 2019 by Mung
228

A second highly selected gene, LYST, is associated with pigmentation, and changes in it are probably responsible for the blanching of the ancestors’ brown fur. Computer analysis for the multiple mutations of the gene showed that they too were almost certainly damaging to its function.

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, design, Michael Behe | 228 Replies

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Comments

  • Flint on Untruth Social
  • Flint on Untruth Social
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Untruth Social
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Sandbox (4)
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • Flint on Sandbox (4)
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on The “stable genius” thread
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • faded_Glory on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Untruth Social
  • keiths on Sandbox (4)
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • faded_Glory on Is AI really intelligent?
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Trump and mental illness
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • faded_Glory on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • faded_Glory on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Is AI really intelligent?
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • colewd on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • Flint on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • keiths on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • J-Mac on Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • keiths on Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?

Recent Posts

  • Another Rasmussen argument: ‘You Can Know There Is Life After Death’
  • The mind can’t be physical because… counting?
  • Is the Notation for the Second Derivative Wrong?
  • Is Joe Schmid right on Catholic miracles?
  • What should a President’s goal be?
  • Lerchner’s odd paper on AI consciousness
  • Dawkins thinks Claude is conscious
  • Is Trumpism a flavour of fascism (and is it useful to call it that)?
  • The ‘just one more god’ argument
  • World Press Photo of the Year 2026
  • Three mathematical nuggets
  • How Go The Crusades?
  • Simplistic thinking about presidential efficacy
  • Meritocracy and (un)fairness
  • AI image generation via diffusion models
  • Rickabaugh and Moreland defend substance dualism
  • The “stable genius” thread
  • Dr. Justin Mooney and Dr. Luis Oliveira discuss the question: if God exists, is everything permitted?
  • AI: The question that really matters
  • Untruth Social
  • J-Mac’s “no-virus” thread
  • Is AI really intelligent?
  • Teaching goldfish to drive
  • According to historian Tad Stoermer, Liberal Nationalists are enabling far right MAGA extremists, and the consequences could be dire.
  • The rear story behind our hands
  • An AI loses it
  • Antivax
  • Trump and mental illness
  • Pascal’s Wager revisited
  • Candace Owens sets the record straight
  • A William Lane Craig “mic drop”?
  • Is the Testimonium Flavianum authentic? Why a prominent scholar thinks so
  • Since it’s likely my final “scholarly publication”….
  • The Great US Military UFO Hoax
  • Thoughts from another infinity skeptic
  • LDS Scholar Terryl Givens: What is God? And where did Christianity go wrong?
  • Does the square root of 2 exist?
  • Annaka Harris: Is Consciousness Fundamental?
  • Wildberger makes waves
  • Michael Alter debunks Gary Habermas’s “Minimal Facts” Case for the Resurrection

Archives

Blogroll

  • Barnbarroch Pottery
  • Birds as Art
  • Bounded Science
  • Canute's Efficient Running
  • Good Math, Bad Math
  • hairy music reviews
  • inigo web design
  • On Kalam
  • Secular Café
  • Talk Rational
  • The Daily Wingnut
  • The Panda's Thumb
  • Todd's Blog
  • Uncommon Descent

Categories

  • 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (22)
  • Active threads (9)
  • Announcements (25)
  • Education and Communication (63)
  • Ethics and morality (80)
  • Evolution (429)
  • Fine Tuning (11)
  • Gender (1)
  • Information Theory (54)
  • Intelligent Design (315)
  • Life Sciences (71)
  • Mathematics (49)
  • Metaphysics (72)
  • Mind and brain (83)
  • Origin of life (43)
  • Penguins et al (40)
  • Philosophy (133)
  • Philosophy of Science (113)
  • Physics (31)
  • Politics (33)
  • Politics (6)
  • Probability and statistics (71)
  • Stories (28)
  • Theism and atheism (155)
  • Uncategorized (686)
  • Upright BiPed's Semiotic Theory of ID (7)
Proudly powered by WordPress