Noyau (2)

…the noyau, an animal society held together by mutual animosity rather than co-operation

Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative.

[to work around page bug]

1,823 thoughts on “Noyau (2)”

  1. keithskeiths

    Alan,

    Spin and more spin!

    That’s yet another lie, making you look even worse.

    Learn to cut your losses, Alan.

  2. keithskeiths

    They’re true. You’ve got a serious lying problem, Alan.

    You’ve been shitting all over TSZ for far too long. Earlier, I wrote:

    Alan:

    Sure. On the other hand, if you intend to persuade someone on a point of disagreement, mocking them is likely to prove counter-productive. This has long been my issue with Keiths’ posting style.

    Alan,

    If I were looking for advice on persuasion, I’d ask someone who was good at it.

    If you genuinely wanted to make TSZ a better place, you’d address your own problems — the immaturity, the lying, the refusal to admit mistakes, the abuse of moderator privileges — instead of chastising others for mockery, which when done properly is an entirely appropriate way of criticizing others’ views and highlighting their flaws.

  3. keithskeiths

    If that were true, you’d be able to refute it. You can’t.

    It could be amusing to watch you try, though.

    Let’s see you explain how your quote mine wasn’t really a quote mine.

  4. keithskeiths

    walto,

    But only 28% of his were dickish, compared to 73% of your own. You win!!

    Oh, please. No one outdicks Mung. Except maybe phoodoo.

  5. Alan FoxAlan Fox Post author

    keiths: Let’s see you explain how your quote mine wasn’t really a quote mine.

    Seems to me you should support your assertion that something you claim is a quote-mine is a quote-mine.

  6. keithskeiths

    Alan:

    Seems to me you should support your assertion that something you claim is a quote-mine is a quote-mine.

    Stop dodging. I already did:

    During our discussion, which was here at TSZ, you actually quote mined yourself in a failed attempt at hiding a mistake you had made. Follow my link — I expose your quote mining at the end of my comment.

  7. keithskeiths

    keiths, to walto:

    Oh, please. No one outdicks Mung. Except maybe phoodoo.

    Alan:

    Well, there are other candidates.

    True. I apologize for leaving out you and Gregory.

  8. Alan FoxAlan Fox Post author

    keiths: Stop dodging. I already did:

    Nope. You’ve hurled out some wild accusations that you fail to support.

  9. Alan FoxAlan Fox Post author

    keiths:
    keiths, to walto:

    Alan:

    True .I apologize for leaving out you and Gregory.

    And I accept your apology. You distribute your demonization of people you disagree (the word seems inadequate) with fairly widely. With apologies to Gregory, do you think you are at all persuasive in bringing folks around to your way of thinking (in as much as that has yet become clear)?

  10. keithskeiths

    Alan,

    Nope. You’ve hurled out some wild accusations that you fail to support.

    You do realize that anyone who actually checks can see that you’re lying through your teeth again, right?

  11. Alan FoxAlan Fox Post author

    keiths:
    You do realize that anyone who actually checks will be able to see that you are lying through your teeth, right?

    The fact that folks are able to look back and form their own opinions without the need for your spin is quite reassuring.

  12. keithskeiths

    The fact that folks are able to look back and form their own opinions without the need for your spin is quite reassuring.

    It shouldn’t be. The evidence convicts you.

  13. Alan FoxAlan Fox Post author

    keiths: The evidence convicts you.

    No. Conviction is a guilty verdict in a court of law. First you need to make a coherent accusation. You’re fond of the lying stuff but light on specifics. Then we need to have a trial. A fair process where evidence is presented and tested. Then the evidence is considered to produce a verdict. But you seem to have no problem with being jury, without the need for judge or trial. Spin loudly and persistently enough and you’ll win. Like Trump (at least for the moment*).

    *I hope!

  14. keithskeiths

    Alan,

    This is a blog, not a court. Each reader can examine the evidence and decide for him or herself.

    Since you’ve lied yourself into a corner and are now trying to lie your way out, let’s have some fun. (Well, fun for me, anyway.)

    Tell us why you took this incorrect statement of yours…

    …and the ultimate power source is air moving differentially than the cart.

    …and truncated it at just the right spot…

    …and the ultimate power source is air moving…

    …to make it appear, falsely, that you were right all along.

    That’s a sleazy move. As I noted:

    That’s not right. The key is the air’s motion relative to the ground, not its motion relative to the cart.

    Come on, Alan. Quotemining yourself is just as dishonest as quotemining someone else.

    So not only did you quote mine yourself — you’re now lying about it. You’re a real bottom feeder, Alan.

Leave a Reply