Guano (3)

Dirty penguin

Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment. Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. 🙂

Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.

[New page as links no longer work properly on Guano (2)]

Post n° 56711

0

363 thoughts on “Guano (3)

  1. T_aquaticus: “Gradualism is the cornerstone of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution because without it, he could not justify the idea that one organism changes into another. “–Nonlin

    That assertion just makes me laugh. Nonlin has the cajones to actually assert that Darwin was unaware of the discrete units of biology, namely organisms and generations.

    Did I mention “organisms and generations” in the segment cited or elsewhere? Why would you make up stuff?

    Entropy: Nonlin needs to understand what gradualism means in evolutionary theory,

    Why don’t you explain?

    Allan Miller: You can have regression to the mean where the mean is not static.

    Did I say ‘static’?!? Are you done killing the straw man?

    Allan Miller: As to gradualism, if one defines it tightly enough, every point mutation falsifies it. You don’t get 0.123 of a substitution. Take that, Darwin! Or Mendel.

    Why don’t you define it (gradualism) to makes sense? And why would you invoke Darwin AND Mendel when Mendel’s experimental findings totally invalidate Darwin’s “gradualism”? Who are you trying to fool?

    dazz: no divergence is observed when populations are isolated

    Hey, when you’re retard, you don’t understand that “divergence of character” is supposed to operate in non-isolated populations.

    dazz: he probably can’t see the differences between different human ethnic groups

    Then different species? And which one is the inferior race in the eugenic viewpoint?

    0
  2. Nonlin.org: Hey, when you’re retard, you don’t understand that “divergence of character” is supposed to operate in non-isolated populations.

    Hey, when you’re a retard you don’t understand that divergence of character also happens in non-isolated populations, with respect to their ancestral populations

    Nonlin.org: Then different species? And which one is the inferior race in the eugenic viewpoint?

    And when your a fuckwad, you forget we were talking about variation around a mean, and how divergence falsifies that hypothesis. It doesn’t matter that we’re all still the same species, the fact that divergence is observed among isolated populations shows that there’s no mean and no magic force keeping populations close to it. Simply because there’s little to no gene flow across these populations, so logically, mutations accumulate separately and populations diverge.

    0
  3. DNA_Jock:
    We’ve been very laissez-faire, but there is a limit folks.

    Stop embarrassing yourself!!!
    Most people either don’t pay attention, or don’t care, what dazz writes..
    I’m ass positive about it ass about the evolution of okapi into zebra… or the other way around… 😉

    0

  4. colewd: Maybe someday you will grow out of it.

    Maybe someday you’ll stop being such a dishonest asshat and quit ignoring all the free science lessons people give you, then coming back the next day with the same stupid claims.

    No one is holding their breath Dory.

    0
  5. phoodoo: Wait a second, I think I see what you are doing. You are trying to get Jock to warn nonlin again.

    Showing off that my conclusion was right?

    Nonlin has never been respectful to anybody. Take an honest look, if you know what honest means that is.

    My comments have been guanoed quite a bit in the past, and I actually don’t complain. I’m guessing that the constant complaining from others is what has stoped admins these days, but, were they to guano comments again, I’d still tell you exactly what you show yourself to be, an idiot, and would not complain if the comment was guanoed. You’d remain the very same idiot regardless.

    Now what about you turn on your brain?

    0
  6. DNA_Jock,

    No no, I am just talking about what a fucking wanker you are in general. This is just more evidence.

    I think it is just coincidence that the only rule violation you found is against the one guy who is making you look the most stupid. The fact that you can’t see any of the other thousands of violations, more coincidence.

    Its not because you are a biased hack. Its worse than that.

    0
  7. Corneel: First you denied the pattern existed (“it’s illusory”), then you merely repeated what the pattern is. Those are not explanations.

    “Illusory pattern” is visible, but caused by random events. This is ALWAYS a possibility in science. Denying is something else. Explaining the basics has gotten old, very old.
    “Something common” is in itself a vast set of possible explanations. It could be animal size, brain size, lifespan, strength, speed, skin area, etc. etc. These and many others DO separate big cats from small cats/primates. I just counted them as one. Did I mention: “Explaining the basics has gotten old, very old”?

    Honestly, do you really think a random anecdote like this will save Darwinism? Wow!

    Corneel: No one’s offended. I just have my doubt that you are going to “solve the argument” by trying to insult your opponent and accusing him of lying.

    I just said: “not trying to insult”. “Lying” is just a fair assessment – it is not an insult. Then again, what’s up with deterministic meat machines, etc. and so many sensibilities.

    0
  8. Entropy: Hum, “surprisingly” you cannot follow simple instructions. Here it goes again: get your head out of your ass

    Screw you Neils.

    0
  9. Entropy: Hum, “surprisingly” you cannot follow simple instructions. Here it goes again: get your head out of your ass

    Blow Jock Alan.

    0

Comments are closed.