Moderation Issues (6)

Please use this thread for (and only for) alerting admins to moderation issues and for raising complaints arising from particular decisions. We remind participants that TSZ is a benign dictatorship, the property of Dr. Elizabeth Liddle. All decisions regarding policy and implementation are hers alone.

1,655 thoughts on “Moderation Issues (6)”

keiths: ’m not asking anyone to take my word for it. The evidence is in this very thread, and you (newton) were there when it all came to light.

I was.

If you had spent less time reflexively defending the moderators and more time paying attention to the facts, you would know that.

Thanks for the advice. It is not a reflex. Is there a post where Mung says he would chose to remain a moderator, his dream job, but that choice was unavailable under any circumstances to due to being irreversibly dismissed by Alan? Maybe , I did miss that. Since you were paying attention could you point it out?

newton:

Is there a post where Mung says he would chose to remain a moderator, his dream job, but that choice was unavailable under any circumstances to due to being irreversibly dismissed by Alan?

As if that were the issue.

This is about Alan’s lies, newton:

Nobody dismissed Mung. He chose to withdraw as an admin.

My response:

Liar.

You removed Mung as moderator (a mere eight minutes after he had undone one of your long-standing moderator abuses), and the other moderators prevented him from being reinstated.