Moderation Issues (6)

Posted on by

Please use this thread for (and only for) alerting admins to moderation issues and for raising complaints arising from particular decisions. We remind participants that TSZ is a benign dictatorship, the property of Dr. Elizabeth Liddle. All decisions regarding policy and implementation are hers alone.

2,673 thoughts on “Moderation Issues (6)”

  1. Mung: Oh please. To what end may I ask? Will it put a stop to it?

    Why would you even propose that only five examples be provided?

    I am trying to understand phoodoo. What are you doing?

  2. DNA_Jock: I am trying to understand phoodoo. What are you doing?

    I’m trying to understand you. I’m trying to understand why you think that five examples cannot possibly be found. I’m trying to understand why you think that finding five examples would change anything at all.

    If phoodoo, or anyone else, can find five examples, will you resign as an admin?

  3. Mung: I’m trying to understand you. I’m trying to understand why you think that five examples cannot possibly be found. I’m trying to understand why you think that finding five examples would change anything at all.

    I have a hypothesis. Rather than jumping to conclusions, I am gathering data to test it. You, on the other hand, are ascribing to me positions that I do not hold. Sadly, this has happened before.

    If phoodoo, or anyone else, can find five examples, will you resign as an admin?

    What a silly idea.

  4. Dear phoodoo,

    I don’t question Nonlin’s intelligence, there’s no such thing to question.

    Best,
    —E.

  5. DNA_Jock: I have a hypothesis. Rather than jumping to conclusions, I am gathering data to test it.

    Well then lazy ass, go check your data, why the hell are you asking others to check the website and see if you can find examples of posters accusing others of low intellect-and the mods doing nothing. You know why you can check it yourself-because you are one of those dam mods! Did you forget that is what you signed up for. I mean you can go ahead and resign if you aren’t interested in reading posts and seeing what their content is. I guess no one told you what moderators are supposed to do.

  7. DNA_Jock: demonstrates your ignorance, as ever.

    Don’t get me wrong, I like when Alan and Jock claim there are rules, then break those rules, and then say they aren’t breaking any rules, because the rules don’t apply.

    Its funny. Stupid as fuck, and that’s why its funny. Because Alan making this site stupid is funny.

  8. Is it known when the most recent person to join this site was, or how many people have joined TSZ in the past 12 months?

  10. phoodoo: Don’t get me wrong, I like when Alan and Jock claim there are rules, then break those rules, and then say they aren’t breaking any rules, because the rules don’t apply.

    Its funny. Stupid as fuck, and that’s why its funny. Because Alan making this site stupid is funny.

    and

    phoodoo: I have submitted a new post. Please check.

    Are quite the amusing coupling. Who are you asking to check your post? The rulebreakers? Is there a rule that posts should be published if they are legal then? Why would you expect a rule breaker to follow that rule?

    In short, collaborator, your hypocrisy is showing.

  11. As one of the targets of phoodoo’s spittle, I request the two comments in question not be guano’ed.
    I recognize that Corneel is also a target, however. Your call, Alan.

  13. Alan Fox:
    DNA_Jock,

    Corneel is referred to as a scumbag in both comments. It’s beyond the pale in my view.

    First, that’s a lie Alan. I asked him if he was a scumbag, I didn’t say he was a scumbag.

    Secondly, to quote YOU, maybe he likes being a scumbag, its not an insult, its an observation!

  14. THIS is why Jock is wrong, for those who don’t believe it:

    So just so you know how wrong you are, and what a gutless person Jock is, let me just remind you how and why he is wrong. If we were to believe Jocks little fake graphs, I should be able to turn the rubber band into a loop right? An Ant starts at the north pole of this loop (it doesn’t need to be a sphere, a loop will do just fine). What Jock is claiming is that no matter the expansion, as long as the ant keeps walking in one direction he can always make it back to the other end of the circle. Now put that in your mind. Think that over, and then tell me if you believe this? Because if you think this over, and you STILL don’t get it-maybe its not that you are the same scumbag as Jock-maybe you just don’t get it. THIS is why the paradox relies on securing one end, and stretching the ant “forward” on the other.

    Still lost Corneel? Or is it an ego thing?

  19. Alan,

    I have an OP in the pending queue. Please publish it and elevate my privileges so that I, like others, can post OPs in the future without waiting for moderator assistance.

    Also, please change the category of my OP from ‘Evolution’ to ‘Theism and atheism’.

    Thanks.

  22. keiths: elevate my privileges

    I’ve swapped your membership category to New Author as requested. Elevation is beyond my powers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.