Noyau (2)

…the noyau, an animal society held together by mutual animosity rather than co-operation

Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative.

[to work around page bug]

2,941 thoughts on “Noyau (2)”

  1. making friends wherever he goes: “JoeG
    Joe Gallien
    This user is suspended until January 18, 2017 9:19am.
    Reason: Account suspended 30 days for repeated violation of dialogue guidelines”

  5. keiths: When has he done that? Links, please.

    LoL! I agree that Richard doesn’t go running to the mods, and I just LOVE how keiths immediately comes running to Richard’s defense.

    Richard’s a big boy now keiths. He can stand up for himself. He doesn’t need your skirts to hide behind any more.

    Do the two of you have some sort of mutual defense treaty?

  6. AhmedKiaan:
    Would an intelligent person have bought UD after Kitzmiller?

    Kitzmiller had no effect on ID. But it did show that you can lie and bluff your way through a trial as long as you have an ignorant judge

  9. Perhaps if you have something of substance to say you wouldn’t have that problem. Blog owners don’t have to allow your losers’ shit on their blogs.

  10. Frankie: Perhaps if you have something of substance to say you wouldn’t have that problem.

    So if Richard had something of substance to say that would disable pre-approval of comments on your blog? That makes as much sense as anything else you’ve ever said.

    Frankie: Blog owners don’t have to allow your losers’ shit on their blogs.

    And yet here you are, spouting shit.

  11. To OM the ignorant ass,

    If Richie posted something of substance it would be allowed on the blog. It’s as if you are proud to be an asshole. And I do understand that my refuting your claims would be seen by you as spouting shit

  12. Yes, Richie, your style of cowardly tard is precious.

    (this is Noyay so please leave the comment here as it is within the rules of this thread)

  13. I was watching a movie over the weekend and realized that Frankie and phoodoo are what you get when you think of Mung and take away reason and accountability.

    (With apologies to Jack Nicholson and the writers of As Good As It Gets.)

  14. Patrick:
    I was watching a movie over the weekend and realized that Frankie and phoodoo are what you get when you think of Mung and take away reason and accountability.

    (With apologies to Jack Nicholson and the writers of As Good As It Gets.)

    LoL! Patrick you don’t know jack about reason and accountability. You would get your ass kicked in an open debate ID vs evolutionism. And I am more than OK with that

  16. Patrick: I was watching a movie over the weekend and realized that Frankie and phoodoo are what you get when you think of Mung and take away reason and accountability.

    Thanks. I think. LoL.

  17. phoodoo,

    Lizzie couldn’t follow the rules and discuss anything in good faith on another site

    Do you have a link to the rule breaking comment?

  18. Frankie: You would get your ass kicked in an open debate ID vs evolutionism.

    Interested readers can see how such a debate already went: https://ogremk5.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/intelligent-design-is-anti-evolution-against-opening/

    And who did or did not get their ass kicked.

    My guess is OgreMKV “learned” about ID from (mis)reading the transcripts of this trial plus whatever “sound bites” he and his ilk could find. It is obvious he hasn’t read any pro-ID literature- or perhaps he did, which would be even more pathetic.

    Compelling stuff. If you like car-crash debates anyway….

  19. Kantian Naturalist writes in response to a particularly arrogant comment from fifthmonarchyman:

    I’m not going to engage with you further. I don’t think you’re capable of arguing in good faith or that you have any intellectual integrity.

    I’ll take the pledge, too.

    My prediction is that FFM will tell you that’s what happens when you encounter a different world view. I would point out in advance that equivocation, smug condescension, dishonesty, and lack of integrity do not constitute a worldview.

    Although I am tempted to create a FFM FAQ to save future participants some time.

  21. Patrick: Until she does, I would like to ask solely in my role as a participant here that everyone move the pure flaming to Noyau.

    How is that working out, lol?

    Lack of self-control appears to be considered a virtue on all sides here at TSZ.

  22. Too funny- the mods had to guano my posts exposing them as scientifically illiterate assholes.

    Life is good- thanks guys

  24. Yes, Richie you are an expert at getting an ass whupping. And I just whupped Alan’s and Patrick’s ass- at least that is what the evidence shows. But you have no idea how to assess evidence because you are an ass-whupped assface

  25. Frankie: But you have no idea how to assess evidence because you are an ass-whupped assface

    Said the guy who was unaware Dembski had quit ID. Pay much attention to evidence much?

  26. Frankie:
    And I just whupped Alan’s and Patrick’s ass

    You are very fortunate to have such a rich inner life, nearly entirely unconnected from reality. I hope it brings you joy.

    (For the record, Alan and I do not share an ass.)

  27. Patrick: You are very fortunate to have such a rich inner life, nearly entirely unconnected from reality.I hope it brings you joy.

    (For the record, Alan and I do not share an ass.)

    LoL! The fact that you are too afraid to debate me on the merits of ID vs evolutionism, coupled with the fact there isn’t a scientific theory of evolution (you claimed otherwise), is evidence enough that you had your ass whupped.

    You can deny it but the evidence is there for all to see.

  28. And only a moron would say Dembski quit ID when in reality he just retired from it. Words have specific meanings and it appears OM wants to disregard that. Typical but still pathetic

  29. Frankie:
    And only a moron would say Dembski quit ID when in reality he just retired from it. Words have specific meanings and it appears OM wants to disregard that. Typical but still pathetic

    http://bfy.tw/9BUn

  30. It wasn’t a job, Richie. Dembski has not given up on ID, he has just moved on. And as I have already said I doubt there is anything else he could add.

  32. Yes, Richie, we already know that you are a cowardly imbecile and a pathological liar.

    Too bad you won’t debate me on the merits of ID vs evolutionism

  33. Frankie:
    It wasn’t a job, Richie. Dembski has not given up on ID, he has just moved on. And as I have already said I doubt there is anything else he could add.

    FrankenVirgilJoe may have a point. I don’t think that it is possible to quit something that has gone bankrupt.

  34. Frankie,

    Oh you’re projecting, Chubs.

    Which chubby little fella was caught changing his blog to try and support his lies? YOU.

    You declare yourself the winner (you won’t have any other judges) after losing exchanges again and again and again.

    Everyone just laughs at you. The ID side wants nothing to do with you (self proclaimed ID leader) and we just like pushing your buttons to see what half-witted inanity you’ll produce when you’re flustered (you don’t dissapoint, C: tat continues).

    You came in 4th of 4 for 3 seats in your local library board. This sums you up. You have no impact on science, education or the origins debate. You are simply unintentional comedy.

  35. Richie, you are nothing but a piece of shit liar. You have lost every exchange we have ever had and they have been blogged about.

    What lie did I change my blog for? You were the one acting as if you were the one who originally used “cupcake” as an insult otherwise you wouldn’t have made a big deal of me mocking you by using it.

    You are one clueless fucktard, Rich.

  36. If ID is bankrupt what does that make evolutionism seeing ID makes testable claims and evolutionism doesn’t?

  39. What is the lie, Richie? Do you have any evidence that you used “cupcake” as an insult before I did? No, so stuff it you egomaniac loser.

  40. Frankie:
    I bet Richie cannot post one exchange we had pertaining to science in which I lost.

    How about your claim that frequency equals wavelength. Everybody but you knows that you lost that one in epic fashion.

  41. LoL! Anyone who can read the thread that started in will see my position was fully explained. Just because you are too stupid to understand the explanations doesn’t mean shit to me.

    And why is it that when the frequency knob on a signal generator is changed the only thing that changes is the wavelength?

    And then please tell us what that discussion has to do with science. Also I wasn’t having that discussion with Richie. So thanks for proving that you are an ignorant asswiper.

  43. Yes dazz, but each wave has one wavelength and a corresponding frequency- it is a true one-to-one correlation. They- freq and wl- are just different numeric representations of the SAME wave.

    When I turn the frequency dial on my wavetek signal generator the only thing that changes is the wavelength. Why is that?

  44. Frankie:
    Yes dazz, but each wave has one wavelength and a corresponding frequency- it is a true one-to-one correlation. They- freq and wl- are just different numeric representations of the SAME wave.

    When I turn the frequency dial on my wavetek signal generator the only thing that changes is the wavelength. Why is that?

    That’s because they’re related, but they’re not the same thing.

    If two waves can have the same frequency but different wavelengths, f and λ are NOT representations of the same wave and certainly not a one-to-one correlation. You have no clue what you’re talking about and seem completely unaware of the roll of propagation speed.

    FREQUENCY OF OSCILLATION x WAVELENGTH = PROPAGATION SPEED

    You’re so stupid that you can’t even google it

  47. I just love all the Trump haters. Haha. You got what you deserve. Next time put up a candidate that can win.

  48. If two waves can have the same frequency but different wavelengths, f and λ are NOT representations of the same wave and certainly not a one-to-one correlation.

    You are trying to compare apples to oranges. Each of those two waves have one and only one frequency that corresponds to its wavelength.

  49. dazz:

    That’s because they’re related, but they’re not the same thing.

    They are directly correlated with a one-to-one correspondence.

Leave a Reply