Noyau (2)

…the noyau, an animal society held together by mutual animosity rather than co-operation

Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative.

[to work around page bug]

2,941 thoughts on “Noyau (2)

  1. Damn, this is insane. I used to be so cocksure that idiocy and bigotry were receding, at least in the western world. Couldn’t have been more wrong. Ultra-nationalists on the rise in Europe, Abbott in Australia, and now Donald fucking Trump in the US. We’re doomed

  2. dazz:
    Damn, this is insane. I used to be so cocksure that idiocy and bigotry were receding, at least in the western world. Couldn’t have been more wrong. Ultra-nationalists on the rise in Europe, Abbott in Australia, and now Donald fucking Trump in the US. We’re doomed

    Doomed? And not becoming fitter year by year?

  3. dazz

    I take you to be the way you take it. Unserious, if you take it unseriously, and serious, if you take it seriously.

  4. Erik: I take you to be the way you take it. Unserious, if you take it unseriously, and serious, if you take it seriously.

    m’key

  5. dazz: m’key

    I’m guessing Erik is alluding to the idea of the survival of the fittest in an environment where “we are all doomed”.

  6. William J. Murray talks crap at Uncommon Descent

    I disagree. I think that both Brexit and Trump won because there are now more avenues of news and factual information, whereas before the population only had what amounts to globalist/marxist propaganda, which totally ignored the consequences marxist/globalist policies.

    This is what you are up against folks.

    I think good people of all races and all classes recognize the threat to western civilization which mass immigration – especially refugee immigration – poses.

    Build that wall!

    Leftists wish to paint everyone who resists unchecked immigration and open borders as racists or xenophobes, which culturally shames them into silence for the sake of cultural equivalence. Look at what happened to Geert Wilders. This works well into the marxist [sic] plan of generating civil unrest: importing millions who have no intention of adopting the cultural values of western countries.

    The official plan of the Muslim Brotherhood fits hand-in-glove with the marxist progressive agenda for civil unrest so they can impose a top-down totalitarian order for the sake of “safety”, even while everyone actually becomes less and less safe.

    Fucksake!

  7. WJM @ ConservativeCentral:

    … before the population only had what amounts to globalist/marxist propaganda …

    Globalist/marxist propaganda like the Daily Fucking Mail.

  8. He’s blown the Pizzagate scandal wide open and now he’s taking on the Commie hoards!

    Go get ’em WJM!

  9. Are WJM, Batshitcrazy77 and Kairos (don’t call me Gordon Mullings) Focus just the trinity? The three faces of the one God they believe themselves to be?

  10. Erik sure is a dishonest dumbfuck. What he always does is try to insert his appallingly dishonest worldview into his disingenuous “questions,” then when people refuse the bait he tries to claim victory.

    But he remains the dumbshit that he’s always exhibited himself to be. Anyway, he’s disgusting.

    Glen Davidson

  11. GlenDavidson: What he always does is try to insert his appallingly dishonest worldview into his disingenuous “questions,” then when people refuse the bait he tries to claim victory.

    Let’s be thankful that he’s the only one here who does that.

  12. GlenDavidson:
    Erik sure is a dishonest dumbfuck.What he always does is try to insert his appallingly dishonest worldview into his disingenuous “questions,” then when people refuse the bait he tries to claim victory.

    But he remains the dumbshit that he’s always exhibited himself to be.Anyway, he’s disgusting.

    Same with FMM and phoodoo. There are like the Harpies of Greek myth. Every time a delightful feast of philosophical discussion is laid out, they shit and vomit over everything in sight and everyone is too distracted by their incessant babbling to enjoy the conversation.

  13. Fifthmonarchyman writes in the Fatima thread:

    Alan Fox: How do you know that?

    Let me guess! Is it by revelation?

    Mostly It’s a tentative conclusion based on the fact that no one has been able to offer a coherent justification for knowledge that does not include revelation.

    I think you’re being disingenuus when you say that. There is nothing tentative about your beliefs and they are not conclusions. They are the consequence of childhood indoctrination and no rational argument or evidence is going to affect them in the slightest.

    Please, at least be honest while you’re proselytizing here.

  14. Patrick:
    Fifthmonarchyman writes in the Fatima thread:

    Mostly It’s a tentative conclusion based on the fact that no one has been able to offer a coherent justification for knowledge that does not include revelation.

    I think you’re being disingenuus when you say that.There is nothing tentative about your beliefs and they are not conclusions.They are the consequence of childhood indoctrination and no rational argument or evidence is going to affect them in the slightest.

    Please, at least be honest while you’re proselytizing here.

    Honesty is your strong suit, Patrick. It is clear that yours is the consequence of childhood indoctrination and no rational argument or evidence is going to affect them in the slightest. So your projection is duly noted.

  15. Kantian Naturalist: Same with FMM and phoodoo. There are like the Harpies of Greek myth. Every time a delightful feast of philosophical discussion is laid out, they shit and vomit over everything in sight and everyone is too distracted by their incessant babbling to enjoy the conversation.

    You have a lot of fucking nerve KN. FMM is unfailingly patient and polite to you. You just don’t happen to agree with his beliefs.

    You think you are civil? That’s a joke. And on top of that, you throw the same Kantian, Epicurean, Descartes…school of -isms as if you couldn’t possibly ever have a thought of your own if someone from 300 years ago didn’t suggest it for you.

    Get off your high horse and try looking at your own behavior for a change. People disagreeing with you is part of discussions. If you can’t handle it, go masturbate in your own Kantian echo-chamber.

    I could care less if you are rude to me, but for you to insult FMM, when he listens patiently to so much of your shit is just pathetic on your part.

  16. Patrick: Sal has made it clear that his goal is not to increase the sum total of human knowledge, or even learn anything himself. He wants to continue to abuse children with his “lessons” on the evils of evolution.

    You’re such an asshole Patrick. Yes. Really.

  17. phoodoo: You have a lot of fucking nerve KN.FMM is unfailingly patient and polite to you.You just don’t happen to agree with his beliefs.

    You think you are civil?That’s a joke.And on top of that, you throw the same Kantian, Epicurean, Descartes…school of -isms as if you couldn’t possibly ever have a thought of your own if someone from 300 years ago didn’t suggest it for you.

    Get off your high horse and try looking at your own behavior for a change.People disagreeing with you is part of discussions.If you can’t handle it, go masturbate in your own Kantian echo-chamber.

    I could care less if you are rude to me, but for you to insult FMM, when he listens patiently to so much of your shit is just pathetic on your part.

    Shorter Phoodoo:

  18. To be fair to Barry, the video actually does say that we’re losing 10 million trees per year above replacement. At least that’s what I hear.

    Could the headline have also said 10 million trees for a while? Well, regardless, he should be going back to the original research, not relying on media reports.

    Glen Davidson

  19. GlenDavidson,

    I agree the narration does sound like “million”. But there is this corresponding graphic… and then the following math showing ‘1.4 trees per person lost a year’ clearly has to have billions number.

  20. Barry has now disappeared the thread. What a moral giant. Do keep telling us about morality, Barry. Dipshit.

  21. Richardthughes:
    Barry has now disappeared the thread. What a moral giant. Do keep telling us about morality, Barry. Dipshit.

    The two things Barry can’t tolerate are, People who disagree with him, people who point out his mistakes, atheists, homosexuals, scientists, people who believe in subjective morality, people who thing that global warming is real, and people who are better at math than he is.

  22. Acartia: The two things Barry can’t tolerate are, People who disagree with him, people who point out his mistakes, atheists, homosexuals, scientists, people who believe in subjective morality, people who thing that global warming is real, and people who are better at math than he is.

    And a pretty solid theist like VJT who decided to actually discuss evolutionary theory rather than the usual caricature of evolution presented at UD.

    After all of the trouble they’ve taken to demonize anyone who disagrees with them, how can anyone suggest that the issue is the evidence after all?

    Glen Davidson

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.