Moderation Issues (6)

Please use this thread for (and only for) alerting admins to moderation issues and for raising complaints arising from particular decisions. We remind participants that TSZ is a benign dictatorship, the property of Dr. Elizabeth Liddle. All decisions regarding policy and implementation are hers alone.

2,711 thoughts on “Moderation Issues (6)

  1. An old dog am I but … in Gutenberg, TwentyEleven theme, is it possible to remove the enormous amounts of white space between paragraphs (blocks)?
    Blocks are a good idea clunkily implemented, IMO.

  2. Allan Miller,

    If you are suggesting a change of theme, I don’t see why not. Lizzie liked twenty-eleven because of the minimalist look but it is as you say a bit clunky now.

  3. Alan Fox:
    Allan Miller,

    If you are suggestinga change of theme, I don’t see why not. Lizzie liked twenty-eleven because of the minimalist look but it is as you say a bit clunky now.

    Well, I was hoping there might be a solution within 2011. I can always switch to ‘classic’ I suppose, for the bits where it matters. There are a couple of other irritants too, but as I know nowt about the nuts and bolts of themes, I’m just a humble user!

  4. Allan Miller,
    Oh, you must be working on that OP! Using blocks does take a little getting used to but I quite like the system now. Have you tried fullscreen and or spotlight mode?

  5. Alan Fox: Or write it elsewhere and import?

    That doesn’t work as well as it did prior to the change in editor. I recently used a bunch of single quotes in HTML tags, and when I imported the document, the editor made a huge mess of things. You’ve got to put arguments in double quotes, not single quotes.

  6. Alan Fox:
    Or write it elsewhere and import?

    I did, but then paragraphs become blocks when you repaste, with 3 blank lines between each. Ditto headings. I’ll cope, it just isn’t as editable as I’d like. There’s all sorts of stuff on the ‘net about dropping into CSS or editing as html, but – despite a lifetime in IT – I’m not a massive fan of brace-enclosed syntax in editors!

  7. That works. You can choose either classic editor or blocks now when writing an OP. I’ve set classic as default and you can switch to blocks using the “switch to block editor” button in the edit settings side bar.

  8. Alan Fox:
    Sorry if that made work for you. Not sure how to fix that other than switch back to classic editor.

    My intent was to warn Allan, even though I was addressing you. I think you ought to keep moving along with WordPress, even if it forces some of us to learn new tricks.

  9. Allan Miller: I did, but then paragraphs become blocks when you repaste, with 3 blank lines between each. Ditto headings. I’ll cope, it just isn’t as editable as I’d like. There’s all sorts of stuff on the ‘net about dropping into CSS or editing as html, but – despite a lifetime in IT – I’m not a massive fan of brace-enclosed syntax in editors!

    LOL. I did my last three OPs entirely in HTML/CSS, using the Caret add-on to Chrome for (language sensitive) editing. Caret does a good job of flagging syntax errors. Sad to say, when I imported the document, some of my CSS was automatically stripped. In particular, my attempts at preventing line breaks in spans with style display: inline-block; came to naught.

  10. J-Mac:
    Adapa has been attacking cloewd for ages…
    Even Tom got tired of this…
    If anyone is looking for trolling/spamming, this is it.

    http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/is-behes-acceptance-of-common-descent-confusing/comment-page-4/#comment-268952

    I’m tired of reading the same frickin comments over and over again since forever…

    Alan, why haven’t you responded to this? This is the moderation thread. You threaten to ban people if they talk about this subject on any other thread. Then when you are asked about your incompetence on this issue, for years, on this thread, you just ignore it.

    It is why you should have resigned as moderator a long time ago.

  11. Damn boohoo, I mean phoodoo. I’ve seen some whining snowflake Creationists in my day but you deserve an award. You make being butthurt into an art form. It’s a pity you’re as scientifically illiterate as your BFF Bill Cole and like him see no problems lying for Jesus.

  12. phoodoo: for years, on this thread, you just ignore it.

    That’s because nobody gives a shit about what you think.

    wah wah wah.

  13. phoodoo: Alan, why haven’t you responded to this?

    I could say I don’t maintain a 24 hour presence here. I could say it dismays me why folks can’t accept the simple premise of “attack ideas not people” or move on. But I’d be repeating myself and it panders to your “lord of misrule” shtick.
    See this comment of yours.

  14. Alan Fox: I could say I don’t maintain a 24 hour presence here. I could say it dismays me why folks can’t accept the simple premise of “attack ideas not people” or move on. But I’d be repeating myself and it panders to your “lord of misrule” shtick.
    See this comment of yours.

    What about the comment of mine? Is it attacking someone? Or are you pointing out the fact that it is not attacking anyone in the slightest and that is why your are mentioning it?

    Up is down? Black is white?

  15. phoodoo,
    I reviewed the comment of adapa’s that you complained about, and decided that it was clearly NOT guano. I also decided that there was no point in explaining my reasoning to you, as you have repeatedly demonstrated your inability to grasp even the simplest of concepts.
    The comment of yours that Alan linked to is hilarious. Let’s just say:
    Ridicule, you are doing it wrong.
    But thank you for the laugh.

  16. Clearly NOT guano:

    Adapa
    Ignored on February 18, 2020 at 3:55 pm said:

    He’s smart enough to make lots of money by selling pseudoscience garbage books to scientifically illiterate rubes like you. You don’t mind being lied to by Behe and the rest of the DI clowns because they feed your religious Creationist beliefs. You end up looking like the moron while they laugh all the way to the bank.

    What’s there to explain?

  17. DNA_Jock,

    I don’t think that, I am asking you? You said we waited all these million years, and now we can see the result, splitting. So we get these outcome, the result of a slow splitting, which now has finally culminated in a split, two new entities, humans and chimps. We also had this same split, when some mammals came down from trees and split from their tree dwellers. We also had this split where these tree dwellers who split, then started to walk on two legs and split from their other mammals. And we also had these other splits where some cows were going into water and some weren’t and those cows that were goining into water were much doing much better reproductively then their friends who weren’t. And the mammals who were hanging out on the ground were doing much better than their friends who refused to come down. And the ones who were walking around on their back legs starting doing much better than their friends who stuck to their four legs method. And then their was this other group of two legged walkers, who looked just like their friends on two legs, but the difference between them was that they had a bigger head, but with smaller teeth. The ones with bigger heads and smaller teeth didn’t really like the ones with smaller heads and bigger teeth, so they also did better reproductively.

    And all these things are going on, and a million other events similar to these, and if you were in the middle of it, the idea is that you would never know you were in the middle of it-because you wouldn’t be able to see, for some reason, that there existed these two groups that looked similar, but one was in the trees and one wasn’t. And you also wouldn’t be able to see that there were these two cows that looked similar, but one went into the water more and one didn’t, and also one started to get a blow hole on their backs, and some didn’t.

    And you would be able to see that there were these two kinds of walking creatures on two legs, only some had small heads and big teeth, and others had big heads and small teeth and they didn’t like each other that much. But the small teeth kind seemed to mate better.

    This and all these other weird things were happening that you can’t see for some reason, and this same thing is happening now, and we just can’t see it.

    So we already have waited, we just can’t see it.

    How dare I! I should be banned!!

  18. phoodoo:
    DNA_Jock,

    “When Israel was in Egypt’s land
    Let my people go
    Oppress’d so hard they could not stand
    Let my people go

    Go down, Moses
    Way down in Egypt’s land
    Tell old Pharaoh
    Let my people go”

  19. phoodoo: Don’t worry Keefer, I would never expect you to have the balls to admit anything.

    Yep boohoo, you are definitely whiny Creationist snowflake of the year! 😀

  20. Adapa,

    Ha, you think I mind? I hope Jock and Alan do it some more. Could they possibly look worse? They are like Rudy Giuliani and Fox News.

  21. phoodoo: Ha, you think I mind?

    Actually you come across as a particularly obnoxious and immature attention whore so no, I don’t think you mind at all.

  22. This situation shows clearly what happens when bias takes place, especially with the moderators – 2 officially biased atheists and one closet atheist, or phony theist.

    If Elizabeth cared, she would do something about it…

  23. Mods, I suspect DNA joke, just proved what I wrote in my comments above.
    They want “trolling” (subjective) to continue but only by one side…

  24. Jock must really know his side has been taking a hit lately. Why was this guanoed:

    What do you think this OP was about?

    Quantum jitters behind DNA mutations

    How about this?

    Sandbox (4)

    How about this OP?

    No cloning theorem: the double edge sword

    Or this comment, which I have repeated more than once on different OPs…

    No cloning theorem: the double edge sword

    This shows the obvious:
    You are clueless, indeed!

    ETA: I’m not going to mention flint because he is beyond cluelessness …

  25. phoodoo: Jock must really know his side has been taking a hit lately. Why was this guanoed:

    What do you think this OP was about?

    Quantum jitters behind DNA mutations

    How about this?

    Sandbox (4)

    How about this OP?

    No cloning theorem: the double edge sword

    Or this comment, which I have repeated more than once on different OPs…

    No cloning theorem: the double edge sword

    This shows the obvious:
    You are clueless, indeed!

    ETA: I’m not going to mention flint because he is beyond cluelessness …

    Which side is that? 😉
    The official one? Or the closet one?

    ETA: its pathetic to watch people like Tom resorting to trolling when ID/Eric ignore him and he can argue about QM because he is clueless…

  26. J-Mac:
    Mods, I suspect DNA joke, just proved what I wrote in my comments above.
    They want “trolling” (subjective) to continue but only by one side…

    LOL! Why is it when Creationist anti-science stupidity is being beaten into a fine pink mist the Creationists always resort to yelling TROLLS!!!!! 😀

    If you guys weren’t so brutally ignorant of basic evolutionary biology we might be able to have a decent conversation. But you are. All we get are True believers like Cole doing his Baghdad Bob imitation and crying “evolution is all wrong!” ten thousand times.

  27. J-Mac:
    I have a question for ALL: Would you like TSZ to continue?

    I think this question remains to be answered by the majority.. .:-)
    Most, if not all blogs on ID vs the rest but TSZ, died…

    Does the majority want the same here???

    ETA: Do the OTHERS wish for TSZ to become panda’s thumb or sandwalk.blog type of place, where OTHERS discuss meaningless issues nobody cares about but very, very few of them?

  28. Joke’s embarrassment continues:
    phoodoo on February 19, 2020 at 5:18 pm said:
    DNA_Jock:
    J-Mac,
    If you wish to highlight your spamming skill on a regular thread, you’ll need to behave.”

    “Oh come on Jock, you scientifically illiterate rube. Aren’t you ashamed of all the stupid evolutionist lies you regurgitate? You just end up looking like a moron, while we all laugh at you.”

  29. DNA_Jock:
    phoodoo,
    I reviewed the comment of adapa’s that you complained about, and decided that it was clearly NOT guano. I also decided that there was no point in explaining my reasoning to you, as you have repeatedly demonstrated your inability to grasp even the simplest of concepts.
    The comment of yours that Alan linked to is hilarious. Let’s just say:
    Ridicule, you are doing it wrong.
    But thank you for the laugh.

    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    Phoodoo Oh come on Jock, you scientifically illiterate rube. Aren’t you ashamed of all the stupid evolutionist lies you regurgitate? You just end up looking like a moron, while we all laugh at you.
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    Guanoed.

    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    Adapa: He’s smart enough to make lots of money by selling pseudoscience garbage books to scientifically illiterate rubes like you.You don’t mind being lied to by Behe and the rest of the DI clowns because they feed your religious Creationist beliefs.You end up looking like the moron while they laugh all the way to the bank.

    You really should be ashamed to be so willfully ignorant. Really ashamed.

    Aren’t you ashamed of all the stupid Creationist lies you regurgitate??

    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Jock approved!!

  30. My view is that Elizabeth wishes TSZ dies on its own and she doesn’t have to pull the plug herself…
    If that’s what people want, it is very simple to do 😉

  31. Personally, I enjoy phoodoo’s performance art, in particular his attempts to ridicule what he perceives as the “evilutionist” position. They’re truly hilarious! However, as has been explained to him on a number of occasions, when the topic is moderation issues, his art should not clutter up regular threads.
    It’s all terribly fascist of us. 😉

  32. It’s hilarious watching two scientifically illiterate Creationist children having a hissy-fit meltdown at the same time! 😀 Let the butthurt rage!

  33. DNA_Jock: “evilutionist” position.

    You misspelled it: It should be delusional position that he is mocking but especially your “theistic” hypocrisy…

Leave a Reply