As a creationist I note that conclusions in origins of biological beings starts with the presumptions of how biology is classified in all its divisions. They do not start clean when begibning investigation but start from presumptions already settled. Al these from small numbers of men in ancient Greece or almost ancient europe.
Even if they were accurate, which they are not, it still would nullify scientific investigation into origins for biology. Its not a pure embracing of raw facts but they are skewed a already settled system or relationships.
So they start with divisions like Animals, insects, plants. Then mammals, reptiles, marsupials monotremes, birds, and finally dinosaurs and others.
Yet all these divisions are not proven before one begins investigations. However received they are hypothesis only. so hypothesis are presumed to be true before more hypothesis are made. I insist this corrupts/nullifies all biological conclusions on origins . its unscientific and has led, this creationist says, to gross error .
Yes i am saying god never created mammals, reptiles, marsupials, dinosaurs, at all. Yes he created plants animals, insects, birds.
Yet this is not my point here. its that classification systems are a first place to start in understanding why biological origin ideas has been so enduring false.
I’m talking about scientific methodology. Classification broke the rules. I’m very intersted to see why I’m wrong or how others suspect this also. True science must be neutral out of the gate.