It really makes my day whenever I read “scientific theories” that don’t fit the main paradigm or predictions of evolutionary theory. The evolution of homosexuality is one of my favorite paradoxes, maybe with the exception of gender evolution/sexual reproduction, that I’m going to save for another OP.
It doesn’t take Einstein to notice that the evolution of homosexuality is not only a paradox but it totally contradicts the driving force of evolution, which is supposed to be reproduction. Since homosexuals can’t reproduce, not in homosexual relations, a problem for evolutionary theory arises. Why would homosexuality evolve in the first place? But more so, why would natural selection preserve homosexuality?
However, as it is with many, many other evolutionary paradoxes the theories to explain them abound… Check out this one of the evolution of homosexuality:
” …in the book I propose that human same sex attraction evolved specifically because it contributed to female sexual autonomy or to the freedom of choice…”
Besides, the recent survey among teenagers have shown that 27 Percent of California Teens Are Gender Nonconforming.
This shows that the evolution of homosexuality, or even gender disphoria, has taken a devolutionary turn… If I were a Darwinist, I would work on new evolutionary predictions, such as the evolution back to asexual reproduction or something like that…
The inability of natural selection to do what Darwinists have believed and claimed can do has proven again to be another evolutionary delusion…