Guano (1)

Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment.  Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. 🙂

Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.

1,658 thoughts on “Guano (1)

  1. Richardthughes: If only you were as keen on keeping UD honest, Mung.

    Been there, done that. Are you trying to get this thread censored too?

    I don’t have the ability to author posts at UD. I do have that ability here. So when my threads get censored, I’d like to know why.

    Surely you can defend the closing of comments on threads here at TSZ.

  2. Mung if this place is so terrible why don’t you just stick to UD? Or maybe start your own blog? Then you can whine and be as hypocritical as you want.

  3. Adapa, even when you accused me of a long history of anti-gay bigotry I did not demand that your post be sent to Guano. I asked for evidence. I didn’t try to censor you.

    The suggestion that I should start my own blog or stick to UD is antithetical to the goals of this site.

    You should beg Lizzie to be promoted to admin/censor so that you can rid this site of people like me.

  4. Mung:

    The suggestion that I should start my own blog or stick to UD is antithetical to the goals of this site.

    The suggestion that you spend all your time whining and crying victim over imaginary slights is also antithetical to the goals of this site.

  5. Mung:
    Adapa, even when you accused me of a long history of anti-gay bigotry I did not demand that your post be sent to Guano. I asked for evidence. I didn’t try to censor you.

    You’ve had half a dozen chances to change my opinion by answering: Do you support equal rights including marriage rights for LGBT people? Do you support no religious exemptions to anti-discrimination laws? Your refusal to answer every time is all the evidence anyone needs.

    The suggestion that I should start my own blog or stick to UD is antithetical to the goals of this site.

    So is crying like a little girl over every perceived slight.

  6. Adapa: So is crying like a little girl over every perceived slight.

    I can’t say that I’m pleased to see that you don’t reserve your bigoted comments to gays. Your bigotry against females is also noted.

    Why don’t you slink off to a site that doesn’t respect your right to be a bigot?

  7. Mung: I can’t say that I’m pleased to see that you don’t reserve your bigoted comments to gays.

    Why don’t you answer the questions and show everyone how you really feel about gays?

    Do you support equal rights including marriage rights for LGBT people? Do you support no religious exemptions to anti-discrimination laws?

    Your refusal to answer every time is all the evidence anyone needs

  8. Adapa: Do you support equal rights including marriage rights for LGBT people?

    What the fuck is wrong with you Adapa? I support equal rights under the law. If you have evidence to the contrary stop being such a coward and present it.

    Where have I ever advocated that LGBT persons should not enjoy equal protection under the laws? If you have evidence to the contrary stop being such a coward and present it.

    You’re an asshole, Adapa. Yet I don’t insist that you ought to take your bigotry elsewhere. I have faith that your kind won’t find a home here at TSZ.

  9. What the fuck is wrong with you Mung? You’re the only one who keeps bringing up the homophobia issue. It would have died six months ago if you didn’t keep trying to milk it for all the victimhood you can.

    You’re an asshole Mung. You’ll be an asshole no matter if you stay here or go.

  10. Mung:
    I can only hope that the stench of censorship here at TSZ is not based on anti-gay and misogynist bias.

    Like the stench you support coming from UD.

  11. Adapa: You’re the only one who keeps bringing up the homophobia issue.

    I nominate this comment for the TSZ hall of fame.

  12. Mung:
    The censors can pretend that they did not censor anything!

    Amazing how they can “fix” what they did not censor.

    (facepalm) The asshole is still whining even in this new thread.

  13. Mung: Is this part of your campaign to increase participation here at TSZ and make it a friendlier place for theists and ID supporters?

    You must support your claims or retract them.

    LOL! Mung the Magnificent, protector of the poor beleaguered ID “scientists”.

    Meyer’s horsecrap has already been beaten into pulp in the real scientific literature Mung. Just like Behe he’s made himself into a laughingstock. He does tell the IDiots what they want to hear which is probably why you idolize him so.

  14. Seeing that ID is not anti-evolution, Nick is either confused, equivocating or doesn’t understand ID. My bet is all three are true

  15. wd400,

    Everyone who misrepresents ID and what is actually being debated has a special place in our hearts. Nick is just more mouthy and public so we respond to that.

    What is Nick going to do once the public understands that mere evolution isn’t being debated? What happens when the curtain is pulled back and decades of misrepresentations are exposed for all to see?

    And what happens when a school board figures this out, wants its students to understand what is actually being argued and does so in a secular manner?

    Lastly why does Nick think it is a bad thing to question untestable claims?

  16. Rumraket,

    You don’t have any idea what is required. Ohno’s paper has never been actually demonstrated to be anything but flights of fancy. Developmental biology has not helped and deformed fruit flies is still all it can provide.

  17. Adapa: Too bad for the IDiots every word about Meyer’s duplicity is true.Must make your moral compass go all haywire to know you’re supporting such a liar and con man.

    Happy New Year!

    Rules are only guidelines!

  18. phoodoo: Happy New Year!

    Rules are only guidelines!

    MY heroes NEVER lie! Just because what they say is demonstrably false, and just because they couldn’t help but know this, is irrelevant. CALLING them on it violates the rules!

    As the political debate fact checkers say, the distinction between “false” and “pants on fire” can be difficult to pinpoint. Maybe Trump sincerely did not know that the cheering thousands he cites never existed. And that his claim to have personally seen them is, well, just a figure of speech or something.

  19. Mung:
    Nick Matzke is not a former DI employee.

    He’s overqualified and over ethical. How’s that complicity sitting with you Mung? Got some “greater good” rationalization?

  20. Mung,

    Paid help.

    Let’s look at the 7 stages of grief:

    – Shock or Disbelief
    – Denial
    – Anger
    – Bargaining
    – Guilt
    – Depression
    – Acceptance and Hope

    Where are you, given that you’ve now seen the two faces of Barry? I thought honesty was a big thing for you? You once leveled at me, “Why would I imagine such thing on just your say so? You’re a known liar.”, as I tought you very basic statistics. Care to now apply that to Barry?

  21. Are you trying to get this thread shut down Richardthughes?

    Don’t you want to find out all you can about this disgruntled former employee who was probably let go for reasons the DI can’t mention unless they want to get hit with a lawsuit?

  22. Rich, to Mung:

    Where are you, given that you’ve now seen the two faces of Barry? I thought honesty was a big thing for you? You once leveled at me, “Why would I imagine such thing on just your say so? You’re a known liar.”, as I tought you very basic statistics. Care to now apply that to Barry?

    I second these questions. How do you feel about Barry’s dishonesty, Mung?

  23. keiths,

    Thank you KeithS. As a point of contrast, how would you react / what would you do if Lizzie did something similar, for example?

  24. Mung,

    Oh, so you’ve taken Barry to task then? And you can still post at UD!! Designer be praised, blessed are the quislings!

  25. keiths: How do you feel about Barry’s dishonesty, Mung?

    Funny question, coming from you, keiths. Have you had a sudden change of heart?

  26. Mung, you are fucking pathetic, you tragedy of a man. you and ID deserve each other and I am delighted to hold you up as a fair example of an IDist.

  27. Richardthughes: Designer be praised, blessed are the quislings!

    I already told Sal I thought Barry was wrong and that I don’t think he [Sal] is a quisling. I guess you missed that post, in all your haste to hate on Barry.

  28. I should launch my own brand of colon cleanser. Anytime some of you get near me you evacuate your bowels. No complaints, some of you truly appear to need it.

    Glad to be of service.

  29. Mung,

    Barry knows what I think. He reads here. I don’t need a proxy, but I’d like you to hold your leadership accountable, rather than roll over and show your belly like the pathetic eunuch we see now.*

    *Bad metaphor, unless eunuchs like mung were indeed belly showers.

  30. What happened to Mung’s moral compass? It sure stops working pretty quickly any time the hypocrisy and outright dishonesty of the ID movement or its pushers is brought to light.

  31. Goddamn it, what happened to y’all, losing your minds and making comment after comment with no excuse but to attack Mung personally?

    Starting with RichardHughes at what’s currently #39 on this page

    Mung, you are fucking pathetic …

    I count six comments which need to be Guano’d: all of RichardHughes’ plus one by Adapa and the one by keiths following that.

    Guys, don’t be like that.

  32. hotshoe_:
    Goddamn it, what happened to y’all, losing your minds and making comment after comment with no excuse but to attack Mung personally?

    Starting with RichardHughes at what’s currently #39 on this page

    I count six comments which need to be Guano’d: all of RichardHughes’ plus one by Adapa and the one by keiths following that.

    Guys, don’t be like that.

    They’ll all go to Guano, but it needed to be said. And Mungs testicles will *still* be in Barry’s purse unless he surprises / delights / proves us wrong.

  33. phoodoo,

    We can hold Mung up as an example of what we find wrong with IDists. You’re just a special guy who makes things up, Phoodoo. I doubt even UD are bothered with you.

  34. dazz:
    Zero explanatory power.
    Same old negative argument from ignorance: “Nature can’t do it, therefore god”
    Same old shifting the burden of proof “Falsify ID by proving evolution can do it”. And of course the same old demand for outrageous level of detail from the opponent and if you can’t, I win. Yawn

    Please stop moderating my edits

Comments are closed.