NAS admits it, evolution was a good joke

NAS president, April Furst, said today that evolution was a very good joke, but it’s gone on long enough. She stated, “It was an incredible setup, over a century and a half of teaching and ‘research’ into evolutionary theory, but we were waiting until people began to catch on to finally admit the joke. But with UD, and stellar minds like Kairosfocus, blowing our cover, we thought it was time to have a good laugh at the idea of Darwinism.”

There were some protests. Gull Able asked, well, what of the tree of life, why do organisms group into clades as they do? April responded, it’s a clear case of design for the sake of our ability to categorize and understand organisms. What order would you expect from the Designer, anyway? Something like the periodic table?”

Charl Atan tweeted April Furst, asking, “So who made the apparent transitionals, like Archaeopteryx and the various hominin fossils like Homo erctus?” Furst responded, “Haven’t you heard of prototypes?” Cen Sor said, “You were paid not to admit this secret. And anyway, why are later organisms made of strangely modified earlier parts and organs, like bat wings made out of mammalian hands?” April Furst was not abashed in the least, saying, “We were always going to admit the evolution hoax someday. And the Designer just happens to be a strong traditionalist, reworking organs incessantly while making little entirely new. The Designer wants kinds to be recognizable, after all.”

So there you have it, the evolutionary hoax is entirely exposed now. Have a good laugh, and get over it.

6 Replies to “NAS admits it, evolution was a good joke”

  1. Acartia Acartia
    Ignored
    says:

    Don’t forget about the irrefutable contributions by other ID leaders like Joe/Frankie/Virgil/ET, Bornagain77 and Bill Murray. Without their efforts, evolution would still be considered to be the best explanation for biological change over time.

    Now we can channel all of that evolution research funds to something more important, like arming teachers, building a wall, or charging women who have abortions with murder.

  2. keiths keiths
    Ignored
    says:

    Doesn’t Gull Able have a lot of siblings, all with the same name?

  3. GlenDavidson
    Ignored
    says:

    Acartia: Don’t forget about the irrefutable contributions by other ID leaders like Joe/Frankie/Virgil/ET, Bornagain77 and Bill Murray. Without their efforts, evolution would still be considered to be the best explanation for biological change over time.

    For sure. Collectively they must have the acumen of a Bible-thumping flat earther, with an equal command of facts.

    Bill Murray, though? Maybe Cole?

    Glen Davidson

  4. GlenDavidson
    Ignored
    says:

    keiths:
    Doesn’t Gull Able have a lot of siblings, all with the same name?

    I seem to have encountered a number of them on the web…

    Glen Davidson

  5. Robert Byers
    Ignored
    says:

    at first i thought this was a April’s Fool joke but I’m reading it on April second.
    Anyways.
    She should of stressed the great iflaw in the investigatiuon by which they never used biological science evidence, you know bio process with results, but instead just foreign subjects like geology, comparative anatomy and genetics, biogeography, lines of reasoning, and general incompetence relative to any other subject in science.
    It literally was a biological hypothesis/theory NOT BASED on biological evidence.

    The trre of life is a good point for the error.
    I have read recently, third time but still only get a third/to a half of it, EINsteins book on physics.
    In it he constantly stesses how physics was settled and then overthrown on points.
    They always had someone come up with another esperiment etc to show why a previous clear conclusion was actually failing.
    I don’t see this in evolutionary biology research. they don’t ever have any experoments to double check conclusions.
    THE TREE OF LIFE is case in point.
    they imagine the only option for likeness in branches is from descent.
    Yet a created biology would also have branches after original kinds/systems.
    A creationist can show a tree looking that way from simply a few kinds and then a system of branching for minor needs in biology. Since the fall of coarse.

    On creation week all critters had the same eyeballs. A good idea for eyes.
    Its not evidence for common descent becauyse they have the same eyeballs.
    thats just a line of reasoning that allows no other option.
    Or rather doesn’t allow a option that mass and energy are the same thing but different things.
    biological origins has not yet had its Newton or einstein i think.
    Its still stuck in old greek ideas and classification systems.

  6. dazz dazz
    Ignored
    says:

    Just noticed this thread, what a laugh Glen, you won the internet

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.