Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment. Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. 🙂
Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.
[New page as links no longer work properly on Guano (2)]
Post n° 56711
Why is EricMH seemingly running away from a thread with his name on it?
It’s not that EricMH doesn’t have appropriate ‘faith’ in IDism. He surely has a lot of his ‘faith’ in IDism because he’s betting his livelihood on it. It’s instead that he seems to have a misplaced fetish with IDism that is not healthy & that will most likely ruin his career except perhaps for occasional ingratiation with current or former creationist non-mainstream evangelical protestants.
EricMH, how about you turn honest for an IDist & finally answer the question?
So calling peoples posts fucking retarded screeds, cool yea?
New rule or a perversion of the old rules?
And yet you go on to suggest post translational modification targets are random and not shared between species. Which is an outright contradiction.
You always were a terrible philosopher. A great propagandist for an uninformed audience as you sure know how to impress with technical jargon and anecdotes about how prestigious a venue is, or how impressed someone was. But critical thinking, not so much.
It’s a recurrent phenomenon among religious extremists. Reason as taken the backseat and is considered at best secondary to blind faith. I suppose that shouldn’t be suprising when it has scriptural support:
Compared to you, my dog’s boogers are also experts in just about everything
From the very paper this J-Tard shit-for-brains guy quoted
From table 1, we see that even for unrealistically low estimates of deleterious mutation rates, the fraction of the genome that can be functional cannot exceed 25%. If the fraction of deleterious mutations out of all mutations in functional regions is even slightly >4%, then the fraction of the genome that can be functional becomes much lower. Realistically, the functional fraction of the genome cannot exceed 10–15%. These results agree with empirical estimates in the literature on the fraction of the human genome that is evolutionarily constrained (Rands et al. 2014).
I am sure you have done more research on this topic than I ever will. Which makes your performance all the more puzzling.
For example, I was wondering why your plots for “development” and “design” showed double-dips; then I realized that you had switched from plotting Worldwide interest to plotting interest in the USA. That’s an odd choice for someone who loves to berate others for their US-centric thinking.
No matter: whichever geography you pick, “evonomics” and “memetics” still thrash “human extension”…
I do not attack you simply because you are an Abrahamic theist. Most of my good friends are. I do not attack you simply because you are an sociologist, either. I push back because you seem to be a bad sociologist.
Stop drinking meths!
I really feel for you. You don’t realize that religious bullshit has turned you into a horrible person. It’s probably not your fault though, that’s what indoctrination does to people.
Your are joking, right??? Or you have been drinking what OMagain has been drinking? 🤔
Mung donates to the DI? HAahahaha
Moderation? What moderation?
Literally ONE post before mine….
I’d prefer OPs spamming MLM schemes.
Yeah, you are a bundle of em.
Your ignorance is showing.
Can you look at some more?! The “meth drinker” is polluting OPs…
This is close to cyber bullying, which is illegal in some civilized societies…
My kids think he has run out of mental institution..He definitely needs help!🤗
Can you please bring this kind of thing up in the Moderation forum? Thanks.
No, Behe deliberately cut & pasted half the table, leaving out the data that DISPROVED his claim that ALL mutations to ApoB were damaging.
This is clear as day, but of course you’re so deluded that you just can’t see it. Pathetic
Whom should I contact regarding an admin who pollutes OPs with comments that belong to Moderation, Sandbox or even Guano parts of TSZ?
Should I ask Mung to move your comments where they belong? Or you have at least a bit of pride left and you are going to do it yourself?
I’ve addressed your claims in your OP. If any of my comments break TSZ rules, feel free to point that out in the Moderation Issues thread.
Can you show me where in the OP I was referring to the grammar issues?
Unless the grammar was referring to the synthetic dimensions of DNA, your comments broke the rules…as you said it yourself…
So, you will move your own comments where they belong, rightly so…
Someone’s run out of antipsychotics again
I bet J-Tard is a morbidly obese burger gulping cholesterol denialist.
Oh, okapi-retard?! Is it 5 o’clock yet?
“i’m almost positive it is wrong.”- Dazz-loco-sciencence Inc. 😉
“i’m almost positive it is wrong.”- Dazz-loco-sciencence Inc. 😉
Are you a big drinker PeterP?
teetotaler for the most part. Acetaldehyde plays havoc with my body.
Why do you ask and why are you trying to change the subject?
Boy! You don’t even know how to Google trans fats vs cis fats? Or, perhaps you didn’t know there was a difference…😉 I don’t know what to tell you…
It’s not rocket science or quantum mechanics… 🤗
Does anybody even care?
Behe calls Swamidass a lesser known reviewer…
I call him an atheist pretending to be a Christian-a wolf in sheep’s clothing…
Most fair minded people see Swamidass as an opportunist who is trying to seize the opportunity to become more known by misrepresenting Behe, Gauger, Axe and DI…
Why would anyone care what he says?
Because moderators like you refuse to ban him for breaking the rules and possibly the law because he apologized?
I’m sorry… can you restore my publishing rights now???
That you think that qualifies as “heritable traits, reproduction, and a competition for resources.” highlights why science is not for you.
That you’re unimpressed that you can create “life” within “life” or create a universal constructor within it shows the limits of your curiosity and / or intellect.
Richardthetweaker is back! Safe from Mung! Alan is in his glory! Brothers in arms reunited at last.
That you are impressed with blinking lights, is a surprise to no one.
That you turned on your computer yourself would be a surprise to everyone.
# Help Richardthetweaker push the button.
Anyone who things that the significance of this is simply “blinking lights” probably should have less intellectual hobbies.
Why are you wasting time on an angry bird?
He lost “the navigation abilities” due to quantum decoherence…and all he has left now is incoherence…😉
This is what uncontrolled anger does…
There isn’t a moderation situation, except in the imagination of a very few people here. So go ahead and discuss anyway.
Of course you say that, you share the prevailing ethos
But it looks very different for the folks on the outs of the power structure here.
Right. There was never a moderator named Mung. Mung wasn’t appointed by Lizzie. Mung wasn’t removed by Alan. And Alan didn’t belatedly try to fix things by restoring Mung as moderator, only to be overridden by you and Jock.
And the whole thing didn’t create yet another moderation kerfuffle.
We just imagined it.
But interestingly, you didn’t provide a link. Here’s one, so that readers can take a look for themselves.
Readers should definitely take a look for themselves. Link
This comment contains no moderation complaints. I am simply urging readers to take a look at something interesting.
Yeah. I’m just kidding about the puppets. You did a great job with the aluGENEalu thing. Salvador, though, needs to see that recombining halfway produces the same result as recombining one-third-of-the-way, as recombining precisely-at-the-“boundary.” It’s obvious, but Salvador doesn’t have the brains to visualize it in his mind. I suspect that if we showed half, one-third, complete, Salvador would still miss that the same goes for one-quarter, two-thirds, etc.
Note that he adds stuff to try and make it harder on himself to understand. Oh! How about introns! But did he understand what you explained? Nah. That doesn’t register anyway. Or maybe it registers, thus the intron goal-post-moving/red-herring, and that’s enough for him to pretend that you didn’t explain anything.
Weird this guy. Very weird.
No, he’s not. He’s ignoring all of it, he’s misusing concepts and has no idea what he’s talking about. I suspect that he didn’t even understand how Alu elements multiply either, he just quoted the words he found making sure first that they did not contain the words “homologous recombination.” Salvador quotes things without understanding them first. Salvador “answers” things without understanding them first.
Salvador is an absolutely incompetent idiot. I’m hard on him because, with all his incompetence in full display, he has the gall to insult those who all-too-patiently try and explain things to him.
You are an idiot.
I think you use words that you don’t understand, hoping that nobody will notice. You’re astoundingly obtuse. What an idiot.
If you didn’t lack such basic knowledge, then you would have to be dishonest to the point of not caring risking ridicule, as long as your intended audience, evolutionists as ignorant as yourself, could not understand the examples either. I’m not kidding at all. You need mental help.
You are an idiot.
The proper question. Its an interesting point, let’s break it down to its constitute parts. First you said “the” as opposed to “a”. As if only one question could be the proper one. Is that so, what is this based on? And when you say “proper” did you mean genuine? Or perhaps you meant the decent question? The virtuous question? But what really is virtuous to a man who does not believe in absolute virtue? So its unlikely you meant that. It could be that you meant punctilious, but that seems rather unlikely, given that you clearly suffer from some levels of retardation, and reading comprehension difficulties, so you wouldn’t even know what that meant, given your putrefied brain.
And then question. Again, its also unlikely that you even know what a question is, you syphilitic wart you.
So, in totem, when you discuss the proper question, we have to assume that what you really wish to say is, “Entropy is an infected douche-bag, of zero intellectual capacity, a steaming pile of rancid weasel shit, dripping through a sieve of loutish, flaccid fatty skin.” And who would disagree with that?
Enough content Jock? Alan?