Why Is Science Unreasonably Effective?

Do any of the skeptics of skepticism think there is an alternative to science in medicine or engineering?

When confronted with unexplained mysteries, is incredulity a better stance than parsimony?

Is the invisible hand that constructs complex systems Adam Smith’s, or the hand of a deity?

Is nature regular or subject to caprice?

52 Replies to “Why Is Science Unreasonably Effective?”

  1. Frankie Frankie

    Patrick: How very authoritarian of you.

    Yes, only evolutionists have authoritarian powers! They get to proudly baldly assert what real scientists would say requires testing

  2. Mung Mung

    Patrick is fine with authoritarianism, as long is it’s the libertarians doing it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.