Why Is Science Unreasonably Effective?

Do any of the skeptics of skepticism think there is an alternative to science in medicine or engineering?

When confronted with unexplained mysteries, is incredulity a better stance than parsimony?

Is the invisible hand that constructs complex systems Adam Smith’s, or the hand of a deity?

Is nature regular or subject to caprice?

52 thoughts on “Why Is Science Unreasonably Effective?

  1. Patrick: How very authoritarian of you.

    Yes, only evolutionists have authoritarian powers! They get to proudly baldly assert what real scientists would say requires testing

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.