Noyau (2)

…the noyau, an animal society held together by mutual animosity rather than co-operation

Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative.

[to work around page bug]

2,056 thoughts on “Noyau (2)

  1. FrankenJoe is just a stream of predictable and vacuous soundbites. He only entertains these days when getting new science wrong.

  2. Richardthughes, the dickless shit-eater, wants to get into a pissing contest. How typical of scientifically illiterate asswipes.

    Good luck with that, cupcake

  3. Joe, you’re melting down too fast. Save the swearing for the latter phases. Try and stretch it out till Friday. Thanks!

  4. Richardthughes:
    FrankenJoe is just a stream of predictable and vacuous soundbites. He only entertains these days when getting new science wrong.

    We should all ignore him. Seriously. He’s so fucking retarded it makes no sense to even waste a single second trying to educate him.

  5. No one has any illusions of educating Joe. We just want him to entertain us.

    As Rich says, that can be hit or miss. You just have to keep poking, and eventually something like “choo-choo math” will spew forth.

  6. keiths:
    No one has any illusions of educating Joe. We just want him to entertain us.

    As Rich says, that can be hit or miss.You just have to keep poking, and eventually something like “choo-choo math” will spew forth.

    You are the entertainment here, asswipe.

  7. This new ignore feature is a boon! I hear a mere whisper in the grass, the occasional swish of cut’n’paste. I suffer from reflexive responditis, so it’s the bee’s knees.

  8. dazz: He’s so fucking retarded it makes no sense to even waste a single second trying to educate him.

    TSZ must be one of the top educational sites on the web by now.

  9. Richardthughes:
    Mung,

    I’m helping Joe with his premature entardulation. Age and weight are both factors.

    It’s not nice to make fun of the mentally and socially challenged. Joe, we all love you. You are doing the best you can given your limitations.

  10. Mung at UD: “It’s a blog. We don’t ban people just because they express ideas you don’t like.”

  11. Rich:

    Mung at UD: “It’s a blog. We don’t ban people just because they express ideas you don’t like.”

    He’s right. They ban people because they express ideas that Barry doesn’t like.

  12. keiths: They ban people because they express ideas that Barry doesn’t like.

    Just to be clear, I do think Barry should allow you back at UD.

    Just so he can ban you again.

  13. Pathetic. Fucking stand up for honesty. Save the ID movement from it’s shitty leadership and their lies. Surprise / delight us.

  14. Richardthughes: Pathetic. Fucking stand up for honesty.

    I try to do that by trying to be honest myself. I can’t force others to be honest. And given the constant lies I see here at TSZ, you can’t force people to be honest either and don’t even try. People who live in glass houses, and all that shit.

    TSZ. Bastion of honesty. Hilarious. If you’re trying to recruit me you need to work on it.

  15. Mung,

    No Mung, I’m not trying to recruit you. You’re a fundy – always were, always will be. But you’re complicit with Barry. If I thought Lizzie was pulling similar shit, I’d call her out, here. I bet most of us would. So don’t start trying to compare, for two reasons:

    It’s not a competition
    You wouldn’t stack up. ‘Integrity thingy’

  16. Richardthughes: You’re a fundy – always were, always will be.

    That’s false. Honesty, Integrity. Anarchy. Bullshit. At your core, Richardthughes, you’re just another liar. First you lie to yourself, then you lie to others, then you lie about others. So all your whinging scores you a big fat zero.

    Go find your balls. If you can.

    Did your mother teach you to be a liar, or was it your father who taught you to be a liar. Or were you born a liar.

  17. Mung, to be precise, saying or implying tht UD does not ban people for posting opinions that disagree with management is borderline psychotic.

  18. Mung And given the constant lies I see here at TSZ, you can’t force people to be honest either

    The only constant lies posted at TSZ are the ones by you, Cordova, and FrankenJoe. Your hypocrisy is easily seen with every ass-kissing love note you write to Barry Arrogant at UD. Your head is so far up his ass if he had a glass belly button you could peer out of it. So cry us a river Mung you ball-less lying Fundy Creationist hypocrite.

  19. petrushka: Mung, to be precise, saying or implying tht UD does not ban people for posting opinions that disagree with management is borderline psychotic.

    What I wrote was posted at UD.

    The published rules of TSZ are as follows:

    Do not use turn this site into as a peanut gallery for observing the antics on other boards.

    The rules of Noyau are relaxed, but in what way or how they are relaxed is not stated in the rules.

    Elizabeth is an absentee slumlord.

  20. Adapa: The only constant lies posted at TSZ are the ones by you, Cordova, and FrankenJoe.

    You accused me of being an anti-gay bigot. You did this in a normal thread here at TSZ where allegedly the normal rules of the site apply. You have no proof. You have no evidence. You lied about me. And your post wasn’t sent to Guano.

    You’re a poster-child example of the schizophrenia here at TSZ. You post your lies with no evidence and get away with it. The mods magically don’t see your lies. Elizabeth condones your behavior.

    You’re a coward and everyone like you is a coward. I’ve observed you long enough to know that you have no interest in either Honesty or Integrity.

    I took everyone on my ignore list off ignore and you get to be the first to go back on the ignore list. Lizzie would be so proud of you.

    At least you’re finally posting your lies in the right thread.

  21. Mung

    WAAAAAHH! WAAAAAAH! WAAAAAAH!

    I see Mung the serial liar and hypocrite just can’t help himself. Why don’t you go suck up to Barry Arrogant a bit more, cry to him about how everyone is always SO MEAN TO YOU for NO REASON AT ALL!

    Funny innit Mung that you’re the only one who manages to get a dozen people all saying the same thing about you? Ball-less hypocritical coward.

  22. LOL! This is pretty funny too. Here’s Mung putting Pedant on ignore earlier today.

    Mung February 20, 2016 at 1:36 am

    Immediate Ignore. Congratulations.

    …but now I get to be the first.

    Mung February 20, 2016 at 3:04 am

    I took everyone on my ignore list off ignore and you get to be the first to go back on the ignore list.

    Mung even has to lie about who he supposedly “punishes” by putting them on ignore! 😀

  23. petrushka:
    Mung, to be precise, saying or implying tht UD does not ban people for posting opinions that disagree with management is borderline psychotic.

    Saying or implying that UD bans people for merely posting opinions that disagree with management is a blatant lie. petrushka has constantly lied, misrepresented and equivocated over on UD. That is why it was booted. The same goes for all TSZ regulars. They just can’t handle the truth

  24. The problem with trying to discuss things with creationists/IDists, here or elsewhere, is that each side comes to the issues for entirely different purposes. The science side wants to discuss science (there are a variety of reasons, but I think especially here the wish for discussion of science predominates), and the creationist side simply wants to ward off a threat.

    Mostly, IDists/creationists are here to perform warding-off rituals, in fact.

    That’s why they just throw whatever they can against evilutionism. Were they in the slightest interested in truly following the evidence wherever it leads, having their evidence knocked out would initiate a rethinking of their position(s). That doesn’t happen (it probably does, some, but almost always it would involve lurkers, not the people commenting), from the top ID leaders to mere chanting denialists like FrankenJoe. They just try to find another weapon to ward off unwelcome conclusions.

    It’s why the “assume others are posting in good faith” rule is so annoying. The creationists almost never do, not according to intellectual standards, at least. On the other hand, the creationists actually think that warding off evilutionism is the good to be had here, hence they are posting in (religious) good faith. There is a good intention behind the rule of assuming good faith–this being the achievement of a certain level of civility–yet when one side is intent on science without reservation, and the other side claims to love science (and often does, so long as it seems safe for religion) but simply loathes the “wrong” scientific conclusions, there’s really no middle ground.

    I don’t follow the particulars of the squabbles over moderation, but it does seem to me that in the end the moderators do favor the evidence-based arguments over the rest. While that might seem fair in principle, in practice the ID/creationist side is going to find this to be unfair, because, well, they don’t really deal with evidence properly.

    I don’t know what can be done about any of this, I guess I just found yet another round with an IDist avoiding the issues, using disanalogies, and trying to babble away the actual question, to be yet again highly annoying. At least we have to recognize that the IDist/creationist almost always is interested almost exclusively in warding off the unwelcome conclusions of science, and not in actually pursuing any kind of discourse aimed at following the evidence. I’ve never quite understood how that can be treated as if it were good faith argumentation, even though they mostly really don’t know how to act in good faith in these matters.

    Glen Davidson

  25. One might easily come to the conclusion that sal is blowing smoke to distance himself from his failure to write a wandering weasel.

    I wonder what happened to that line of argument.

Leave a Reply