Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment. Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. 🙂
Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.
LoL! You are an ignorant coward. You wouldn’t face me if you life depended on it
No, the OP that proves you are a liar and a loser
Do you still live in that empty parking lot you gave as an address to meet you last time?
How so? Explain. All I see is you not understanding CSI’s entailment so (like Barry) and hence not understanding ID. Funny spending so much time on something and failing so hard!
Parking lot ! :p
Maybe FrankenJoe could be the attack piss-ant.
Hand over ears defense. Impressive and brave!
Rich, I can’t even see your comments. It doesn’t matter anyway as you don’t have anything of substance to say.
Mung,
Maybe he’s in Barry’s purse?
dazz,
Look, dazz the spazz, you don’t get to start with all of the steps that need to be accounted for. Behe never says that one step is too far for Darwinian processes to traverse.
Is “numerous” equal to or greater than “one”? Can someone please show dazz the spazz how to use a dictionary
The organisms are too simple, Flint. Nice to see that you are still an infant
Please stop moderating my comments in my thread. Thank you
dazz,
He never says what you claim. And as for you I stepped in some of you today and threw away my slipper
dazz,
Yes, you are lacking logic and any kind of thinking skill, dazz.
Again, CSI (per Dembski) is only present if not accounted for by ‘natural forces’, so by definition they can’t create CSI. Frankie does not understand ID, but likes the turbo encabulator.
dazz has nothing better to do. scoffing and mocking without intent. 🙂
dazz,
LoL! You didn’t corner anything but your own ignorance.
dazz,
Your whining is not an argument. All you have is a falsification that demands we prove a negative and no positive case.
You guys love to say that attacking evolutionism will not prove ID and yet all you do is try to attack ID and think it proves evolutionism.
Holy shit- all you guys are doing is posting personal attacks. Stop the hypocrisy.
dazz,
LoL! What a dolt! Of course your objections are subjective and those things come from ID experts and flow directly from ID.
Your desperation, while amusing, is not an argument.
I see Richie responded and I am sure the response is full of nonsense. However it hasn’t made it through the filter so I cannot see it. Maybe Richie will grow a pair and post his refuting OP for all to laugh at.
OMagain,
Stay on topic or stuff it, OM. You don’t have anything but to badger IDists with your ignorance. I am not interested.
You are filtered out
ID doesn’t have anything to do with Christianity. Obviously you have issues and should seek help. And I understand evolution better than you ever will. Loser
Flint,
Wrong again, moron. It is the hole evos dug when they made the claim of having a step-by-step process for producing the diversity of life, including flagella. Obviously you are just another evoTARD loser
Richardthughes,
Well, we already know why you are here, to be a troll, just like you say. You are good at that.
dazz,
LoL! A program that is designed to do something and does it has nothing to do with Darwinian evolution. Darwinian evolution is not a search and GAs are. Darwinian evolution is not actively searching for a solution and GAs do.
So GAs model Darwinian evolution only in the minds of the willfully ignorant
I posted one, Alan, You can deny it all you want but that shows you are being dishonest
Darwin didn’t say anything about nested hierarchies and Mayr said they are the antithesis of evolutionism. You don’t know what a nested hierarchy entails. Transitional forms would ruin any attempt at forming a nested hierarchy. Common Descent cannot be tested, Alan. There aren’t any hypotheses for NS producing Common Descent.
You love to spew trash but you can never back it up
Alan the little baby can dish it out but he can’t take it. Just pathetic but typical. How dare you attack me and then hide behind the moderator’s skirt
Darwin didn’t say anything about nested hierarchies and Mayr said they are the antithesis of evolutionism. You don’t know what a nested hierarchy entails. Transitional forms would ruin any attempt at forming a nested hierarchy. Common Descent cannot be tested, Alan. There aren’t any hypotheses for NS producing Common Descent.
dazz,
I said that GAs are designed to solve problems and I explained why they follow different paths
And you can’t show that the next mutation will get beyond the design it is stuck at. So you don’t have an argument
That is only your opinion. Try to make a case
Except I have considered that I may be wrong, it’s just that no one can refute what I have said. You are one dishonest poster, dazz
dazz,
And morons should be named after you
LoL. I finally started watching the video. It’s design, you morons.
“I’ve written software that essentially makes wind turbine blades live, mate, and die.”
And I’ve written software that essentially makes ID critics turn into morons.
Mung,
Don’t be a pedantic dipshit.
The effect is the same whether you treat mathematically non-viable sequences as illegal or give them a score of zero.
As I’m sure everyone realizes. Including you.
Your squeaky wheel is wasted here Mung. Go fix uncommon descent.
Post your code, if you can.
Rich,
Attack gerbils need squeaky (exercise) wheels. Mung is auditioning for Casey’s spot at the DI.
That’s the narrative you push. I think most neutral readers will find our most limiting factors are You, Phoodoo and Virgil (in reverse order)
Not just drunk posting, drunk OP starting. But always with the whining.
You should teach TSZ a lesson by taking your business elsewhere and never coming back.
You fight for your right to have that thing you don’t want. Or something.
Why don’t you start your own board. Then you can have as many Featured Posts as you like. Of course you wouldn’t be able to whine and pout like a little baby as you do here.
Poor Mung, too dense to understand analogies.
When you don’t have shit, distract.
Richardthughes,
Oh for heaven’s sake, now I see it is not just you inability to understand biology and science Richard, its your inability to understand what a clueless fucking moron you are.
I mean, I guess we can’t blame you, in a way, but we can still ridicule you for being so utterly inane and so embarrassingly uneducated, right? Right? I mean, you can’t help being so contemptibly stupid, I get that. You can’t help that you are so painfully humorless. Perhaps its just not your fault that of all the worthless, ineffective genes for intelligence, you got a box full of rotten, sour, maggot infested fruit. But was it someone who made you coral your children to draw pictures of the words on the screen and then help you to chose the words closest to butthurt? Did someone force you.
LoL! Unless you can show a non-human designer is supernatural- Behe did not say the designer was supernatural- you don’t have anything but your whining
You’ve changed your tunie, Frankie.
Did you really just write this sentence Sal, with zero ability to know how ridiculous it was?
You have no problem using science to detect if something is man made, if it is man made?
Sal, what is wrong with your brain? Are you trying to parody Richard?
Alan Fox,
That’s a lie.