Guano

Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment.  Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. :)

Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.

970 thoughts on “Guano

  1. phoodoo: Not caring about what is true or not true in science, and only caring about what you what to be preached getting preached makes one scientifically dishonest.

    “One” is you, phoodoo.

    Defend your statements on scientific arguments and not on insults.

    What scientific theory do you accept for the origin of biodiversity?

  2. Allan Miller,

    You don’t care that Wikipedia clearly paints a one sided, dishonest portrait of the JFK killing. Its censorship designed to brainwash people with stupid false information. And you are fine with that. That makes you scientifically dishonest.

  3. You souldn’t be going for death by cop, would you phoodoo, with that thrice-posted Guano-bait?

  4. ***** figure tied with journalist Denyse O’Leary fails. Will pseudonym ‘Timaeus’****** distance itself from Denyse idiocy? Show us please if/when you ever do, ****** make known your many Canadian pseudonyms.

    ******** (happy Discovery Institute supporter in *****, even in Catholic Institution) works pro-Behe intentionally against atheism in his little ***** history. He is an obvious fanatic idiot for IDism. ***** has cleary demonstrated not balance criticism. But he sure makes you folks upset! = )

    How about this? [link deleted]

    Will you find any more ‘fanatic’ than *****? He hides his strange personal ideas because his thoughts are simple low-level ***** religious studies in *****. But he will try to fight TSZ forever. ***** (aka Kantian Naturalist – he revealed this here already) low-brow is anti-theist or anti-theist low-level ‘philosphers’ for Timaeus/*******.

    Kantian Naturalist is disenchanted Jew.

    ******(‘Kantian Naturalist’ as he admitted here) one of intentional most saddest person at Catholic University. This is guy is dog-low kennel in Washington. Low level naturalism dirty deep. He is not cutting edge nor inspiring.

    They live closet to each other Kantian Naturalism and TImaeus. Maybe they will someday meet?

    Timaeus/***** = sad discussion in electronic era. Both empty tricksy (they really want to convince you). Both sad. Both show their dis-welcome to atheists. KN loves his matheism, empty theology.

    [AF edits by request]

  5. Gregory: *****. This is guy is dog-low kennel in Washington. Low level naturalism dirty deep. He is not cutting edge nor inspiring.

    I leave it to the judgment of the moderators whether or not this post should be put in the Guano forum.

    *AF edit

  6. It’s fair game b/c he knowledged it on-line.

    ‘Kantian Natural’ is *******. Quick, easy discovery of biased atheist.

    ****** (he tricked them) empty atheist. Reality exposes TSZ faker.

    * AF edit

  7. Ah, TSZ defense TSZ that is why they block and refuse truth. Fake intellectuals. ***** fantasy is just such a person. Oops, *****. Forgot to pluralise. But happy him here at TSZ fake reality.

    *personal details edited out by AF

  8. Gregory:
    Ah, TSZ defense TSZ that is why they block and refuse truth. Fake intellectuals. ******* fantasy is just such a person. Oops, . Forgot to pluralise. But happy him here at TSZ fake reality.

    Outing yourself as a Markov bot are you?

    * AF edit

  9. Admins, please move Phoodoo’s comment and this to Guano. Phoodoo, for general pointless sniping please use the old thread, where you have several questions requiring answers. Thanks.

  10. phoodoo:

    It doesn’t matter Lizzie, because we have already leaned this week that the way to conclude there is design on Earth is to simply look at it and come to the conclusion that it looks designed, just like keiths and Alan taught us when looking at carvings.

    Um, no.

    By the way, phoodoo, how is your “Lizzie hates TSZ” hypothesis holding up?

    phoodoo:

    Haha, even Lizzie can’t stand it here, why would you think he would want to.

    And:

    Lizzie made a site full of partisan liars that even she can’t stand to read.

    And:

    I can certainly understand why Lizzie can’t stand her own site she created, it is full of people who are scientifically dishonest, and who simply want a world which preaches their worldview.

    Another phoodoo flameout.

  11. Whilst you may, for various reasons, not like the answers we give, Phoodoo, at least you got answers. You never answer any questions posed to you, like “how old is the universe | earth | life and how do you know this?” I suggest you up your game and show us how it’s done rather than moan about a level of discourse you yourself are unable to meet.

Comments are closed.